Here at Books We Love, we love books. We love writing them, we love talking about them, and most of all we love sharing them with our readers. Welcome book lovers, here you will find original content written by the member authors of the Books We Love publishing community. Visit us at www.bookswelove.net and enter our latest contest
Subscribe to this blog
Follow by Email
Troubles & Cannibalism in the New World by Katherine Pym
I’ve decided one of the
reasons it took so long to get the original settlers off the ground and their
colonies successful was due to their origins. Merchants wanted money and power
and they felt they could get it by banding together to outfit a fleet of ships and
send men to the North America. Their money would establish these settlements. Their
money would insure the men in these new settlements would give a great return
for the merchants’ investments.
There were several merchant companies
that ranged up and down the East Coast of North America. Given grants by their
monarch, they considered the land theirs from Florida to Newfoundland to do
with as they pleased. The colonists were ‘employees’ of these companies. They
had to obey what the merchant companies dictated. With the spoils, these
merchants in turn, were to give wealth and power to their monarch.
Men came first, then women. They
used the tools and supplies provided by the merchant company to build, to trap
furs as payment to the merchants. If the colonists found the passage to the
Northwest and the Pacific, if they found gold or silver, these, too, were to be
given to the merchants.
Merchant companies did not
provide well for the extremes that pervaded this new land; i.e., harsh winters,
unyielding soil, wild beasts and the original peoples who could turn violent.
It seemed little thought was
given to establishing long term settlements. To do this, one must have tools and
the know-how to use these tools to build new tools and implement them into the
task at hand. They must have livestock, not for eating but for breeding. When
the herd could provide, then the colonists could eat. They must learn the type
of seeds that would grow in their soil, their climate.
Settlers relied on the
merchants returning each spring/early summer with clothing, food, more
implements, powder and shot for their guns. If the governments changed during
this time, or the merchant company disbanded, if it took years to obtain more
money, sometimes merchants did not return, or if they did, it was years later. This
put the colonists at great risk.
Many died of starvation. In
the latest archeological digs, signs of cannibalism have been discerned.
George Percy, of early
Jamestown, wrote how badly life was. He sadly mentioned people were so hungry,
they dug up corpses and ate them.
Capt. John Smith wrote: “One
amongst the rest did kill his wife, powdered (salted) her, and had eaten part
of her before it was known, for which he was executed, as he well deserved...
Now whether she was better roasted, boiled or carbonado’d (barbecued), I know
not, but of such a dish as powdered wife I never heard of.”
In the spring of 2013,
archeologists revealed they had located the first evidence of cannibalism
with the discovery of a 14 year old (Jamestown circa 1609-10). Found in a
refuse pile, her remains showed she had recently died.
Someone, or several, cleaved at
her body and head. She was dismembered and her flesh removed. Knife tips gouged
away at her skull and chin as if to cut away her tongue or throat tissue. “Her brain, tongue,
cheeks and leg muscles were eaten, with the brain likely eaten first, because
it decomposes so quickly after death.”
The clumsy attempts to cut
away flesh shows whoever had done this had never butchered an animal for food.
This was done by people desperate enough to eat another human being after she
The skull was restructured,
so you can see what she looked like. Due to copyright issues I’m not sure if I
can share this young girl’s picture.
A Master Passion - A Founder's Marriage Angelica, older sister to Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton, was a piece of work. Perhaps you've met someone like her--enchanting, intelligent, daring, filled with boundless energy, bubbling over with wit. She was also a champagne tastes kind of gal who brought the party along with her, brightening any room she entered. Men and women alike adored her. She had admirers not only in America, but in France and in Britain, too, among them the leading lights of the time. The French Statesman Talleyrand, the Whig Leader, Charles Fox, the play-write Richard Brinsley Sheridan, as well as Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and the Marquis de Lafayette were among the many luminaries who fell beneath her spell. We can no longer see the glamor in this picture of her and her first child, painted by Trumbull. Fashions in beauty change. In one letter to his father-in-law, Hamilton speaks of Angelica and his wife Elizabeth as "our b…
As a writer
I know the power of words, and I’m constantly searching for the right words to
make my stories live. But recently I discovered the word “feminism” has been
misunderstood. I had no idea until daughter Andrea received a rude response
after she admitted she was a feminist. Made me wonder, why has this word been
demonized? Dictionary.com defines feminism as “advocating social,
political, legal and economic rights for women equal to those of men.”
Merriam-Webster has a similar definition. The term feminism originated in 19 century
France, I learned. A second-wave began in the United States during the early 1960s
with Betty Friedan’s book The Feminine
Mystique. Friedan wrote this book after talking with friends, who had
given up their careers to become housewives. These women felt unfulfilled in
their domestic roles, Friedan claimed. She blamed women’s magazines, run by men,
for encouraging women to become mothers and housewives, rather than career
women. A dif…
I grew up in
an engineering family and worked many years at Boeing. There, great flying
machines are built to stay in the air for literally hours and hours and jet halfway around the world without refueling. This is well engineered
stuff. With that in
mind, I’ve always considered the human body a high maintenance machine. It is
fragile and can’t take much without breaking down. It must regenerate (sleep) for
a huge amount of its shelf-life. It requires hours of upkeep, always needs wiping
down or, over the years, completely submersed in water with gallons of soap.
The human body must be constantly refueled which produces prodigious amounts of
venting waste. This turns out to be an expensive, never ending maintenance slog.
have thunk this a good design? Not me. I’d really like a conversation with the
designer and tell him my thoughts on how the human body could be improved. But
with that conversation unlikely, I’ll have to stew over poor engineering. Let’s take
one of the abo…