![]() |
| Harmonist church-another society in Harmony, PA, founded by Rapp |
![]() |
| Harmonist church-another society in Harmony, PA, founded by Rapp |
This is the cover for my new book, due to be published in May. As usual, BWL has come up with a great cover. The four leaf clover features throughout the story in one way or another, so it really is a case of 'it does what it says on the tin.' The cover is the easy bit though. Editing it has been an altogether different matter.
The first half of the book is set in 1979. The second half, six years later. Also, to confuse matters further, I wrote it some time in the 1980s, which was, as the introduction says; 'a time before ready meals, before takeaway coffees. A time when a microwave oven was considered the latest in technology. A time when we used maps to navigate, reference books for research, and learned phone numbers off by heart.'
I discovered the manuscript, which I had never tried to have published, when I was clearing our loft space. I immediately sat down to read it, ignoring all the dust and spider webs as it took me back in time to when I was a young mother, at home all day, looking after small children. The further I read, the more I identified with Joanne, the heroine, even though her life was very different from mine. She, too, dialled numbers on a phone that was attached by cable to a land line. She travelled by bus. If she was late home then the meal her mother had cooked her was dried out in the oven. Teashops were more usual than coffee shops. Sunday lunch was sacrosanct, and holidays were never in hotels but in guest houses in seaside towns. I remembered, too, what it was like to meet someone more sophisticated and not want to lose face, which is something that happens to Joanne.
Her life and relationships are certainly not mine, but it was clear that in those far off days my observations and early memories had shaped the story.
Trying to re-write it for the present day would not have worked. Life and how people handled relationships were so different then. With no cell phones or Internet, people had to meet up to talk. And they had to rely on physical clues...will she let me kiss her....does that mean she wants me to leave...why is he looking at me like that? No dating apps. No texting. No sexting. And interestingly, far more freedom to risk a kiss than is possible in today's 'me too' world.
So instead of attempting a re-write, I began to edit and polish what would be a retro book. By the time I sent it off to the editor I was feeling quite pleased with myself. It was a good story wrapped up in an unintended history lesson. Then it came back and the editor's criticisms and suggestions made me look at it anew with a much more critical eye. She was right. I did need to change the tense in quite a few places. I did need to tighten up the dialogue. And where she got it wrong I needed to revisit to see why, and then rephrase.
It's been an interesting exercise. I have not only learned to read an older manuscript much more critically, especially one that I had forgotten about, but I have also realised how much better a writer I have become over the years. My later books get few editorial comments. My writing is tighter, and my characters leap straight from my imagination onto the page instead of me having to work at developing them.
So now all I have to do is decide whether to write a new story, or whether to defy the spiders and go hunting in that loft space again.
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0228634733?ref_=dbs_m_mng_rwt_calw_tpbk_0&storeType=ebooks&qid=1 753570492&sr=1-1
Finding killers is Calgary Police Detective Janice Maidstone’s job, for now, but her parents want her back on the short-grass prairie in southern Saskatchewan to take over the ranch. Janice must choose between the police service in a job she loves, or the life as a rancher to carry on the family legacy.
The decision hangs over her head while she and her partner investigate their latest case involving a pregnancy, a playboy fiancé, a greedy business partner, and a jealous bride.
BLOOD
Before I get to the main topic of my blog this month, I’m going to start again with our nearest space neighbour. Here’s some late breaking news about the moon (and no, it’s not about the Artemis mission). Chris DeWeese, Senior Editorial Writer for The Weather Channel wrote this:
“Thanks to new observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), NASA announced that the moon will be spared from what could have been a very explosive run-in with a “city-killer” asteroid in 2032. This new data suggests that, instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 will pass 13,200 miles from the lunar surface. The agency had previously given this asteroid a 4% chance of hitting the moon, which might not sound like much, but is actually pretty high stakes, so far as these things go.
The large asteroid, estimated to stretch between 174 and 220 feet in diameter, was first discovered in 2024, and scientists have been closely tracking it ever since. Early concerns were that it could potentially hit Earth; if an asteroid this size did hit our
planet, it could wipe out a city, carrying the equivalent force of 500 atomic bombs. The good news? We don’t have to worry about that happening, either to us or to our cold, silent satellite.
So now that we can heave a sigh of relief about avoiding a catastrophe on our doorstep that we didn’t even know about, let’s get on to what I had planned to write about this month!
Blood.
As a writer of Police Procedural Murder Mysteries, you might think I’m going to write about gory crime scenes. Salacious suspense. Fictional femme fatales. Sorry. This month, it’s all nonfiction.
Blood makes up about 7-8% of our body weight. From high school biology, we know that it’s made up of red blood cells (erythrocytes), white blood cells (leukocytes), platelets, and a liquid portion (plasma). This straw-coloured fluid accounts for about 60% of total blood volume, while erythrocytes make up roughly 40%, along with leukocytes and platelets. (Physiology, Blood Volume Ragav Sharma , Sandeep Sharma)
I’ve always been a regular donor at Canadian Blood Services (formerly the Canadian Red Cross). Mom and Dad set the example early, and as soon as I turned 18, I made a point to attend the travelling clinics. I think the first place I donated was in Pincher Creek, Alberta in 1973. For many years, I gave whole blood. They didn’t even start accepting plasma donations until 1998, when they became the Canadian Blood Services.
Throughout those years, I was fortunate to have employers who were accommodating and never questioned the two hours I took to trek across the city, donate and return to work. At the time, I made the effort because it felt good, in a remote sort of way.
But in August 2013, I became one of the approximately 52% of Canadians (they, or a family member) who needed blood (or blood products), when I broke my leg, requiring a two week hospital stay and two surgeries. I ended up getting two units of whole blood and suddenly the value of commitments made by volunteers to give blood became personal.
After receiving the blood product, I had to wait a number of months before donating again. After the deferral period was over, I never got back into the habit. Life got in the way and I only went occasionally and even returned to donating whole blood instead of plasma.
Last week, a Facebook ad popped up reporting that most of the plasma used in Canada comes from the United States. Plasma Donation in Canada - Canada.ca What?? The idea that we are dependant on another country to maintain our blood supply, especially since
so much of that blood is not given by volunteers, but by people who are paid to give, doesn’t sit well with me. Although I’ve seen no statistics to the contrary, I can’t help but think volunteers IN GENERAL would be healthier than those who give because they are being paid.
With that in mind, I’ve decided to make donating a priority again. In fact, I’ve made a specific goal. Over the next 12-month period, I plan to donate 25 times. Since Canadian Blood Services allows plasma donations every six days (weekly), it should be easy to roll up my sleeve twice a month.
But is that healthy?
At each donation, haemoglobin levels and in the case of plasma, blood protein levels are tested. If I fail, even a tiny bit, to meet the standards, I’ll be deferred for several months, and have to do a walk of shame out of the clinic (just kidding, they’re very nice about it and even let you stop and partake of the snacks before you go).
Other common reasons for deferral include out-of-country travel, illness, surgery, vaccinations, and tattoos.
Recently, the news reported that two people died after giving plasma at a for-profit Winnipeg collection centre. To date, no causal link between their donations and their death has been established. 2 people die after giving plasma at for-profit Winnipeg collection centres: Health Canada | CBC News. Over the course of my plasma donations (well over 200), I’ve never experienced a negative reaction, nor has anyone that I know who donates.
But why is it so important to donate plasma?
• Plasma is used for transfusion in hospitals for someone who needs more blood volume because of burns, shock, trauma, or other medical emergencies.
• It is used to help develop new medications
• Clotting proteins found in plasma are used to help control bleeding (critical for those suffering from clotting disorders)
• The immune proteins contained in plasma assists in cancer many treatments, chicken pox, measles, tetanus, immunodeficiencies, kidney disease, hepatitis B, brain disorders and bone marrow transplants.
While many people cannot donate (due to medical conditions or proximity to donation centres), many more can, but never do. If you’re one of those that don’t, I encourage you to do it. Take a friend. Who knows, you, or someone you love, may need it.
Fun Fact: Frozen plasma has a shelf life of one year. Some references:
Plasma
What Is Plasma in Blood?
The
Aquamarine Necklace: Beswick, Bonny: 9780228634737: Books - Amazon.ca
CHANGE
The bi-annual kerfuffle over the time change has me thinking
about how I react to change.

The Greek philosopher Heraclitus from the city of Ephesus (photo
of the ruins at Ephesus) said that “no man ever steps in the same river twice”.
In other words, our lives are characterized by constant change. So, if the
nature of life and my reality is in constant flux, why does it so often make me
uncomfortable?
Though the seasonal time change
doesn’t bother me, why do so many get their knickers in a twist when March and
October roll by and it comes to change the clocks? After all, it’s only taking
one hour of sleep away. And let’s be honest, how many times do we accommodate bedtime
pushed an hour one way or the other to watch a great television program or the
Olympics? To have company over?
And how difficult is it to change clocks? Goodness sakes, these
days, most devices change automatically. If not, how many time pieces are there
in a typical house? Three or four? Surely changing them can’t take more than
five minutes.
In the big scheme of things, what’s the big deal? Life throws
other things our way that legitimately warrant the energy to complain.
But I admit, my resistance to change is increasing as I get
older. Why?
Is it fear? Even die-hard adventurers must fear the unknown, don’t
they? Maybe their anxiety about unpredictable outcomes and personal
inadequacies is tempered by the experience and bravado I lack.
How much is due to a moral attachment to existing routines? I
don’t think I often mutter to myself if it was good enough for someone else,
then it’s good enough for me. And I definitely try to avoid saying “that’s
not the way Mom used to cook it” when I go for dinner to my sister's house!
Maybe it’s just because I don’t have as much energy to burn
as I did as a younger pup. That’s legitimate, isn’t it, when there’s additional
effort required to make a change and I drag my feet? Even when, for example,
when someone suggests yet ANOTHER software programme to do something that
trusty, reliable EXCEL can do. It’s not that I cannot learn something new. It’s
that I do not WANT to devote the energy to it (even if the end result might be
worth it.)
Mind you, I find the change more palatable when it is
suggested by someone I trust.
Change requiring an alteration to my routine, forcing me out
of my comfort zone, leads to (sorry to admit) passive resistance, usually.
Procrastination – often. And outright opposition and sabotage – who, me?
I am consciously trying to accept change more willingly and
with a better attitude.
The Greek Stoic philosopher Epictetus is credited with saying
that we cannot control what happens to us, only how we react to it. Though this
is common sense, I need to remind myself of it when I’m being particularly
obstinate.
Though my tendency is to have a knee-jerk reaction, I try to pause.
Take a breath and a second look. Why am I objecting? Being contrary? Would I
accept the change if it came from someone else? Or what if I came up with the
idea?
I will change the perspective. Does it make it easier? Is the
impact of the change going to rock my world (few are) or is it just a minor
alteration? And is the effort worth the
result?
What if I revise my mental image? If I decide to stay away
from desserts, it’s easy to sulk. But instead of deprivation, if I focus on the
trousers I want to get back into, it’s easier to leave the table.

The bottom line is that I want to steer clear of transforming
into a curmudgeonly old biddy, constantly locking horns and resisting change.
April is
going to be filled with making changes. Both the sequel to Janice Maidstone’s
“The Aquamarine Necklace” (“What Love Made Us Do”) and the revised edition of
“Under the Ombu Tree” are back from my editors and are waiting for me to do the
final polishing. Can I look at the changes they suggest with an open mind?
Willing heart?