Tuesday, December 2, 2014

FRONTIER LIFE - AUSTRALIA AND AMERICA - MARGARET TANNER


FRONTIER LIFE – AUSTRALIA AND AMERICA

 Life on the American and Australian frontiers has a strikingly similar history. For example, take the The American Homestead Act, and the Australian Act of Selection.
 

America: The original Homestead Act was signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln on May 20th, 1862. It gave applicants freehold title to up to 160 acres of undeveloped federal land west of the Mississippi River. The law required only three steps from the applicant - file an application, improve the land, then file for a deed of title. Anyone who had never taken up arms against the U.S. government, including freed slaves, could file a claim on the provisions that they were over the age of twenty one and had lived on the land for five years.

The Homestead Act's lenient terms proved to be ill-fated for many settlers. Claimants didn’t have to own farming implements or even to have had any farming experience. The allocated tracts of land may have been adequate in humid regions, but were not large enough to support plains settlers where lack of water reduced yields. Speculators often got control of homestead land by hiring phony claimants or buying up abandoned farms.

Most of us visualise the frontier home as a rustic log cabin nestled in a peaceful mountain valley or on a sweeping green plain. But in reality, the "little house on the prairie" was often not much more than a shack or a hastily scratched out hole in the ground. In the treeless lands of the plains and prairies, log cabins were out of the question so  homesteaders turned to the ground beneath their feet for shelter. The sod house, or "soddy," was one of the most common dwellings in the frontier west. The long, tough grasses of the plains had tight, intricate root systems, and the earth in which they were contained could be cut into flexible, yet strong, bricks.

Ground soaked by rains or melting snow was ideal for starting sod house construction. When the earth was soft and moist, homesteaders would break the soil with an ox- or horse-drawn sod cutter, which was an instrument similar to a farming plough. Sod cutters produced long, narrow strips of sod, which could then be chopped into bricks with an axe. These two- to three-foot square, four-inch thick sod bricks were then stacked to form the walls of the sod house. Soddy roofs were constructed by creating a thin layer of interlacing twigs, thin branches, and hay, which were then covered over with another layer of sod. To save time many sod houses were built into the sides of hills or banks. Some settlers gouged a hole in a hill side, so they only had to build a front wall and roof.
As a result of their extremely thick walls, soddies were cool in the summer and warm in the winter. Soddies were also extremely cheap to build. Of course, there were drawbacks to sod-house living. As the house was built of dirt and grass, it was constantly infested with bugs, mice and snakes. The sod roofs often leaked, which turned the dirt floor into a quagmire. Wet roofs took days to dry out and the enormous weight of the wet earth often caused roof cave-ins. Even in the very best weather, sod houses were plagued with problems. When the sod roof became extremely dry, dirt and grass continually rained down on the occupants of the house.
A typical American log cabin measured about ten by twenty feet, regardless of the number of inhabitants. Settlers often built lofts across the cabin roof or lean-tos across the rear of the cabin to give the family more space. Typically, frontier cabins featured only one room, which served as kitchen, dining room, living room, workroom, and bedroom.

Homesteaders could often build a log cabin in a matter of days, using only an axe and auger. No nails were required for the task. The first step in construction was to build a stone or rock foundation, to keep the logs off the ground and prevent rot. Once the foundation was laid, settlers would cut down trees and square off the logs. These logs were then "notched" in the top and bottom of each end then stacked to form walls. The notched logs fitted snugly together at the corners of the cabin, and held the walls in place. After the logs were stacked, gaps remained in the walls. Settlers had to jam sticks and wood chips into the gaps, then they filled in the remaining gaps with cement made out of earth, sand, and water. Fireplaces were built of stone, and often had stick-and-mud chimneys. Most cabins had dirt or gravel floors, which had to be raked daily to preserve their evenness.
Australia: In the colony of Victoria the 1860 Land Act allowed free selection of crown land.  This included land already occupied by the squatters, (wealthy land owners) who had managed to circumvent the law for years and keep land that they did not legally own.

The Act allowed selectors access to the squatters’ land, and they could purchase between 40 and 320 acres of crown land, but after that, the authorities left them to fend for themselves. Not an easy task against the wealthy, often ruthless squatters who were incensed at what they thought was theft of their land.

In 1861 the Act of Selection was intended to encourage closer settlement, based on intensive agriculture. Selectors often came into conflict with squatters, who already occupied land and were prepared to fight to keep it. The bitterness ran deep for many years, often erupting into violence.

The first permanent homesteads on the Australian frontier were constructed using posts and split timber slabs. The posts were set into the ground, about three feet apart, according to the desired layout. Slabs of timber were then dropped into the slots. A sapling or similar, straight piece of timber ran across the top of the posts, which allowed them to be tied together so they could support the roof. Clay was often plugged in between the joins and splits of the cladding to stop draughts. The internal walls were sometimes plastered with clay and straw, lined with hessian/calico, white washed or simply left as split timber. Roofs were pitched using saplings straight from the bush and often clad with bark. Early settlers learnt from the aborigines that large sheets of bark could be cut and peeled off a variety of trees and used as sheets to clad the roof.

So, it can be seen that there is not much difference between the Australian Act of Selection and  the American Homestead Act. In both countries frontier life was tough, and only the strong and resilient survived.

Margaret Tanner writes historical romance set in Australia. 

http://www.bookswelove.net/tanner.php
 

 

 

18 comments:

  1. Similarities, yet differences. Even in science fiction stories about settling new worlds you can find similarities. Using history to show what happens is an interesting way of creating. Good luck with your books. I believe I've read them all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for dropping by and for your support, Janet, much appreciated.

      Regards

      Margaret

      Delete
  2. Margaret, as you say, life on the frontier wasn't as how many people think of it. As I understand it, many settlers on the plains just gave up and left, especially during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Shirley,
      Thanks for dropping by. Here in Australia, many settlers walked off the land too, drought, flood and land that was not very productive, plus fighting the wealthy land owners, broke many of them and they just left.

      Regards

      Margaret

      Regards

      Margaret

      Delete
  3. Cabin construction worked where there were trees, otherwise, you get the soddy. Yes, I've been struck by the similarities of Australian & American frontier life before--just thinking about this could ignite a story. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Juliet,
      Thanks for dropping by. There certainly are a lot of similarities between the history of our two countries.

      Regards

      Margaret

      Delete
  4. Interesting post, thanks Margaret! As a historical romance author myself, I love these little tidbits of life in earlier times. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for dropping by, much appreciated. I like picking up little historical tidbits too. Amazing what I come across sometimes.

      Cheers

      Margaret

      Delete
  5. MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!

    lindarb49@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Merry Christmas to you also, and thanks for dropping by.

      Cheers

      Margaret

      Delete
  6. Fascinating. I'm staying in this century. Great post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Me too, this century suits me just fine.
      thanks for dropping by.

      Cheers

      Margaret

      Delete
  7. An interesting post. Thanks Margaret. Survival of the fittest really has meaning when you think of the hardships settlers in both countries endured.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Survival of the fittest is certainly was. thanks for dropping by.

      Cheers

      Margaret

      Delete
  8. Terrific post, Margaret. I'm convinced once again that I am happy living in this century. I like a solid roof over my head and a lovely comfy bed to lie in at night-one free from creepies and the dreaded snakes. I often wonder just how some of the settlers survived. Imagine trying to sleep on a stinking hot night without a cooler or air-conditioning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for dropping by. Yes, I like my nice comfy bed too. Some of these people slept on the floor or a mattress filled with straw.

      Cheers

      Margaret

      Delete
  9. Thanks for posting, Margaret. I've noticed lots of similarities in the American and Australian past, especially the "Wild West" aspect. What makes me ponder are the many reasons those settlers opted for such a life. Then, when I think about how the cities of the time were probably just as cruel, with the poverty, overcrowding, and no way to earn a decent livelihood, it occurs to me that it was hope...the same reason that brought many immigrants to our American shores in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you are right, it was hope of improving their lot which was the driving force between most of these people.

      Cheers

      Margaret

      Delete

I have opened up comments once again. The comments are moderated so if you are a spammer you are wasting your time and mine. I will not approve you.

Popular Posts

Books We Love Insider Blog

Blog Archive